A few weeks ago, I reviewed three social sharing websites, all three of which revolved around building more tweets for your content.
Today, I am reviewing a few more. All of these have value, but it greatly depends on what you plan to promote.
I had not reviewed Triberr earlier, because it lacks flexibility. You cannot post any link or any tweet for sharing. You can submit up to three blog feeds. That’s it. If you guest post or if you put something on YouTube or on Tumbr, there is no way to ask people to share it. And if you don’t really want one of your posts shared (suppose it is just administrative), there is no way to hold it back.
I have changed my mind; these limitations do not mean that it should not be reviewed, especially since so many people use it.
The best aspect of Triberr is that it functions automatically, feeding your blog posts to your tribe members. If all you want to promote are your own blog posts, then this is an easy addition to your arsenal. But keep in mind that you still have to visit now and then to share your tribemates’ posts.
Tribemates? Yes, Triberr is divided into tribes of ten. So the only items you will see for review are the other nine people’s posts. You can be in multiple tribes, and therefore see more than nine posts, but still you are limited in content to the members of those tribes.
Your posts and theirs will show up in a stream something like this:
I do participate, but I have found that I share much more than my content is shared. There is no really tally of credits, as there are at the three services I reviewed earlier.
As for the quality of the content and the quality of the accounts that would share your content, that is totally determined by who is in your tribe. There are a few trigger words that will remove your posts from being retweeted through Triberr – but those posts will still show up, so tribemates can still view them and RT directly from the page.
Although every bit as Twitter-centric as the three services I reviewed earlier, Triberr also includes FaceBook, StumbleUpon, LinkedIn and Google Plus.
Social Buzz Club is similar in quality to Viral Content Buzz (reviewed earlier); you have to get approved to participate. So the content tends to be high quality and the sharers tend to share from high quality accounts. This is not the place to post eCommerce links and marketing offers.
The tabulation of points is a little strange. You get a point every time you share someone else’s post, and you spend a point every time you post a link to be shared – whether that link gets shared 100 times or never. Like with Triberr, I find myself sharing a lot more than getting shared.
There is a FaceBook support group, which is a very helpful and convenient way to have an instant social-sharing mastermind group.
Social Buzz Club covers Twitter, FaceBook shares, LinkedIn and StumbleUpon. Twitter-centric to some degree, but perhaps less so than those previously mentioned.
What I would like to see is a much easier way to see who is sharing my content, what is being shared and where it is being shared. I find I have to dig to find this information and it is not all totally clear. It would be even better if the credit system compared shares to shares, rather than shares to posts.
Overall, I do not find I get a lot of buzz from Social Buzz Club, although the quality is good.
You Like Hits is different than the other services reviewed today and a few weeks ago primarily in the plethora of sharing options. This service is much less Twitter-based than the others, although the Twitter options are more varied: tweets, favourites, retweets and follows.
Unlike most of the others, FaceBook is missing. But Google Plus and StumbleUpon are both included – not for sharing or liking, but for following.
The quality varies, with some highly-informative posts and some highly spammy posts. Where You Like Hits really excels, regardless of quality, is for visual and audio content. It offers YouTube views, likes and subscribers. It offers Pinterest likes, pins, repins and followers. And it offers followers for Instagram, ReverbNation and SoundCloud.
Yes, if you have music to promote or eCommerce products with pics or with related videos, this platform gives you plenty of promotion options.
One really cool thing about You Like Hits is that they give you ten free points just for showing up each day. Every 24-hour period you can claim 10 points with two clicks. It is their incentive for you not to slack off.
If nothing else, this can easily build your Twitter follower base. Although not the most targeted followers, they are for the most part at least real (unlike those buy-100-followers services) and tend to be useful if your target audience is composed of either marketers, the general populace or people interested in music.
Some of the code on the site is buggy. When I “click here to load more”, it never does. And very often when you click on an item to view, you discover that it has run out of points.
I do like the running chart of my shares, so I can see exactly what has been shared, where, by whom.
By appearances, Retweet.It is the smallest of the services I have reviewed so far. That is to say, it appears to have the fewest users and the fewest options for content to tweet.
It is most similar to EasyRetweet in three ways:
- It focuses solely on Twitter. You cannot earn FaceBook, StumbleUpon or Google Plus support through Retweet.It.
- You earn only half the points that you spend. So if you want your content to be shared 10 times, you have to share 20 pieces of content in order to earn enough credits. Why do these two services make you work doubly hard to share your content? I assume that it is to make credits scarce and force users to purchase credits.
- The ratio of spam to quality content is low. In fact, the lowest of any of the services I have so far reviewed, even lower than EasyRetweet. Perhaps this is because so much of it is purchased. More often than not, I cannot find any new content good enough to tweet.
It seems to me that there is a vicious circle going on here…
- Credits are kept scarce.
- People are forced to buy credits.
- Purchased credits tend to be for spammy tweets.
- Therefore, there is very little worthwhile content to share.
- With little to share, it’s hard to earn credits.
- Credits become even scarcer. The downward spiral continues.
But there is another way in which Retweet.It is similar to EasyRetweet. If you want tweets for an eCommerce page or a landing page, these are the places to go. Nobody will call you out for spamming or for low quality. Sales pages are not allowed on JustRetweet or on ViralContentBuzz, and you cannot get them on Triberr. So there is a place for Retweet.It in the Internet marketing ecosystem.